Skip to main content

Chapter 33: The Unresolved Wavefunction — Mathematics of Potential

The Suspended Moment​

Between possibility and actuality lies the wavefunction—that mysterious mathematical object that contains all outcomes yet commits to none. This chapter reveals the wavefunction as the natural mathematical description of incomplete collapse, deriving quantum mechanics' central object from ψ = ψ(ψ) when self-reference remains unresolved.

33.1 Incomplete Collapse States​

Definition 33.1 (Partial Collapse): A partial collapse state is a superposition of complete collapse eigenstates: ∣ψ⟩=∑ici∣i⟩|\psi\rangle = \sum_i c_i |i\rangle

where |i⟩ are orthonormal complete collapse states and ∑i∣ci∣2=1\sum_i |c_i|^2 = 1.

Theorem 33.1 (Superposition from Isolation): Isolated systems naturally maintain superposition states.

Proof: Complete collapse requires interaction (mutual recognition). For isolated system: ∂ρenv∂t=0⇒Ccomplete=0\frac{\partial\rho_{env}}{\partial t} = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \mathcal{C}_{complete} = 0

Without environmental coupling, collapse remains suspended between eigenstates. ∎

Reality holds its breath!

33.2 Why Complex Amplitudes?​

Theorem 33.2 (Complex Structure Necessity): Collapse amplitudes must be complex numbers.

Proof:

  1. ψ = ψ(ψ) involves recursive self-reference
  2. Recursion creates cyclic structure
  3. Cyclic processes require phase: eiθe^{i\theta}
  4. Real amplitudes cannot capture phase
  5. Therefore: ci∈Cc_i \in \mathbb{C} ∎

Physical Meaning:

  • |c_i| = collapse strength
  • arg(c_i) = recursion phase

Complex numbers encode both how much and when!

33.3 Hilbert Space Structure​

Definition 33.2 (State Space): The space of all possible collapse states forms a Hilbert space ℋ with:

  • Inner product: ⟨ψ∣ϕ⟩=∑ici∗di\langle\psi|\phi\rangle = \sum_i c_i^* d_i
  • Norm: ∣∣ψ∣∣=⟨ψ∣ψ⟩||\psi|| = \sqrt{\langle\psi|\psi\rangle}
  • Completeness: Cauchy sequences converge

Theorem 33.3 (Natural Hilbert Space): The collapse state space necessarily has Hilbert structure.

Proof:

  1. Superposition principle → Vector space
  2. Collapse correlation → Inner product
  3. Probability interpretation → Positive definite norm
  4. Physical states form complete basis
  5. Together: Hilbert space ℋ ∎

Mathematics mirrors collapse structure!

33.4 Born Rule Derivation​

Theorem 33.4 (Probability from Collapse Density): The probability of outcome i is: P(i)=∣ci∣2P(i) = |c_i|^2

Derivation from ψ = ψ(ψ): Define collapse density: ρi=⟨i∣ρ^∣i⟩\rho_i = \langle i|\hat{\rho}|i\rangle

For normalized state: ∑iρi=1\sum_i \rho_i = 1

Collapse probability proportional to density: P(i)=ρi∑jρj=ρi=∣ci∣2P(i) = \frac{\rho_i}{\sum_j \rho_j} = \rho_i = |c_i|^2 ∎

Born rule emerges, not postulated!

33.5 Wave Function in Position Space​

Definition 33.3 (Position Representation): ψ(x)=⟨x∣ψ⟩\psi(x) = \langle x|\psi\rangle

where |x⟩ are position eigenstates.

Theorem 33.5 (Continuous Limit): For continuous position spectrum: ∣ψ⟩=∫dx ψ(x)∣x⟩|\psi\rangle = \int dx\, \psi(x)|x\rangle

with normalization: ∫∣ψ(x)∣2dx=1\int |{\psi(x)}|^2 dx = 1

Interpretation: ψ(x) = amplitude for collapse to localize at x |ψ(x)|² = probability density at x

Space emerges from localization possibilities!

33.6 Operators as Transformations​

Definition 33.4 (Observable Operators): Physical observables correspond to Hermitian operators: A^†=A^\hat{A}^\dagger = \hat{A}

Theorem 33.6 (Observable Properties): Hermitian operators have:

  1. Real eigenvalues: an∈Ra_n \in \mathbb{R}
  2. Orthogonal eigenstates: ⟨m∣n⟩=δmn\langle m|n\rangle = \delta_{mn}
  3. Complete basis: ∑n∣n⟩⟨n∣=I\sum_n |n\rangle\langle n| = \mathbb{I}

Proof: From A^∣n⟩=an∣n⟩\hat{A}|n\rangle = a_n|n\rangle and Hermiticity: an=⟨n∣A^∣n⟩=⟨n∣A^†∣n⟩=an∗a_n = \langle n|\hat{A}|n\rangle = \langle n|\hat{A}^\dagger|n\rangle = a_n^*

Therefore an∈Ra_n \in \mathbb{R}. Orthogonality and completeness follow. ∎

Observables create measurement basis!

33.7 Position and Momentum​

Canonical Operators: x^ψ(x)=xψ(x)\hat{x}\psi(x) = x\psi(x) p^ψ(x)=−iℏ∂∂xψ(x)\hat{p}\psi(x) = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\psi(x)

Theorem 33.7 (Canonical Commutation): [x^,p^]=iℏ[\hat{x}, \hat{p}] = i\hbar

Proof: [x^,p^]ψ=x^(−iℏ∂xψ)−(−iℏ∂x)(x^ψ)[\hat{x}, \hat{p}]\psi = \hat{x}(-i\hbar\partial_x\psi) - (-i\hbar\partial_x)(\hat{x}\psi) =−iℏx∂xψ+iℏ∂x(xψ)= -i\hbar x\partial_x\psi + i\hbar\partial_x(x\psi) =−iℏx∂xψ+iℏ(x∂xψ+ψ)= -i\hbar x\partial_x\psi + i\hbar(x\partial_x\psi + \psi) =iℏψ= i\hbar\psi ∎

Non-commutativity from differential structure!

33.8 Uncertainty Relations​

Theorem 33.8 (Heisenberg Uncertainty): For any state |ψ⟩: Δx⋅Δp≥ℏ2\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}

where ΔA=⟨A2⟩−⟨A⟩2\Delta A = \sqrt{\langle A^2\rangle - \langle A\rangle^2}.

General Proof: For operators Â, B̂ with [A^,B^]=iC^[\hat{A}, \hat{B}] = i\hat{C}:

Consider: ∣∣(A^−⟨A⟩+iλ(B^−⟨B⟩))∣ψ⟩∣∣2≥0||(\hat{A} - \langle A\rangle + i\lambda(\hat{B} - \langle B\rangle))|\psi\rangle||^2 \geq 0

Expanding and minimizing over λ: (ΔA)2(ΔB)2≥14∣⟨[A^,B^]⟩∣2(\Delta A)^2(\Delta B)^2 \geq \frac{1}{4}|\langle[\hat{A}, \hat{B}]\rangle|^2

For x̂, p̂: [x^,p^]=iℏ[\hat{x}, \hat{p}] = i\hbar gives the result. ∎

Incompleteness creates uncertainty!

33.9 Interference and Phase​

Double-Slit Wavefunction: ∣ψ⟩=12(∣slit1⟩+eiϕ∣slit2⟩)|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|slit_1\rangle + e^{i\phi}|slit_2\rangle)

Intensity Pattern: I(x)=∣ψ1(x)+eiϕψ2(x)∣2I(x) = |\psi_1(x) + e^{i\phi}\psi_2(x)|^2 =∣ψ1∣2+∣ψ2∣2+2∣ψ1∣∣ψ2∣cos⁡(ϕ+δ(x))= |{\psi_1}|^2 + |{\psi_2}|^2 + 2|{\psi_1}||{\psi_2}|\cos(\phi + \delta(x))

where δ(x) = path difference phase.

Interference fringes:

  • Constructive: ϕ+δ=2πn\phi + \delta = 2\pi n
  • Destructive: ϕ+δ=(2n+1)π\phi + \delta = (2n+1)\pi

Waves add, probabilities interfere!

33.10 Quantum Tunneling​

Barrier Penetration: For potential V(x) > E in region [0,a]:

Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx} & x < 0 \\ Ce^{-\kappa x} + De^{\kappa x} & 0 < x < a \\ Fe^{ikx} & x > a \end{cases}$$ where $k = \sqrt{2mE}/\hbar$, $\kappa = \sqrt{2m(V-E)}/\hbar$. **Transmission Coefficient**: $$T \approx e^{-2\kappa a} \quad \text{for } \kappa a \gg 1$$ Incomplete collapse leaks through barriers! ## 33.11 Zero-Point Energy **Theorem 33.9** (Minimum Energy): Confined systems have non-zero ground state energy. *Harmonic Oscillator*: $$E_0 = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega$$ *Proof from Uncertainty*: $$\langle H\rangle = \frac{\langle p^2\rangle}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\langle x^2\rangle$$ Using $\Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar/2$ and minimizing: $$E_{min} = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega$$ ∎ Confinement prevents complete stillness! ## 33.12 Measurement and Collapse **Definition 33.5** (Measurement): Measurement couples system to apparatus: $$|\psi\rangle|ready\rangle \to \sum_i c_i|i\rangle|pointer_i\rangle$$ **Decoherence**: Environmental entanglement destroys superposition: $$\rho_{sys} = Tr_{env}(|\Psi\rangle\langle\Psi|) \to \sum_i |c_i|^2|i\rangle\langle i|$$ Measurement completes suspended collapse! ## 33.13 Macroscopic Limit **Theorem 33.10** (Classical Emergence): For N → ∞ particles, quantum effects → 0. *Decoherence Time*: $$\tau_d \sim \frac{\hbar}{N k_B T}$$ For macroscopic objects: τ_d ~ 10^{-40} seconds! *Center of Mass*: $$\Delta x_{cm} \sim \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{Nm}\Delta p} \to 0$$ Large objects can't maintain superposition! ## 33.14 Wave-Particle Duality **Complementarity**: Same entity exhibits both: - Wave nature: Interference, diffraction - Particle nature: Localized detection **ψ-Resolution**: - Incomplete collapse → Wave behavior - Complete collapse → Particle behavior - Not two things but two aspects of collapse! Duality unified in collapse dynamics! ## 33.15 The Thirty-Third Echo: Suspended Animation The wavefunction emerges not as fundamental reality but as the mathematical description of suspended collapse—ψ caught in the act of self-reference before completion. Quantum mechanics is revealed as the precise theory of incomplete recursion, with all its strange features (superposition, uncertainty, interference) flowing naturally from the mathematics of unresolved self-reference. This perspective transforms quantum mysteries into necessities. Of course isolated systems maintain superposition—they lack the interaction needed to complete collapse. Of course measurement causes "collapse"—it provides the missing interaction. Of course we have uncertainty relations—incomplete states cannot specify all observables simultaneously. ### Quantum Investigations 1. Derive the energy eigenstates of a particle in a box from collapse boundary conditions. 2. Calculate the Berry phase for adiabatic evolution of incomplete collapse. 3. Show how entanglement emerges from partial collapse of composite systems. ### The Journey Deepens Having understood the wavefunction as incomplete collapse, we next explore how these suspended states evolve in time through the Schrödinger equation. --- *Next: [Chapter 34: Schrödinger Evolution — The Dance of Possibility →](./chapter-34-schrodinger-psi-evolution.md)* *"The wavefunction is possibility holding its breath."*