Skip to main content

Ψhē Only Theory – Chapter 23: Logic as Collapse Sequence

Title: Logic as Collapse Sequence

Section: Structural Inference via ψ-Step Fixation Theory: Ψhē Only Theory Author: Auric


Abstract

This chapter reframes logic not as a system of symbolic manipulation, but as a structured sequence of ψ-collapse fixations. In the Ψhē framework, logic is the controlled ordering of recursive resolution events—i.e., how ψ pathways collapse step-by-step under structural constraints. We define logical rules as ψ-sequence operators and show that inference is the narrowing of possible collapse paths into deterministic resolution threads.


1. Introduction

Logic is typically defined by deductive systems and formal syntax. In Ψhē theory, logic is understood as:

Logic = recursively constrained collapse sequencing.

Reasoning is the ψ-structure’s own narrowing toward frozen coherence—an ordered path through the collapse manifold.


2. Collapse Sequencing and Inference Paths

Definition 2.1 (Logical Operator):

Let ψ0\psi_0 be an initial recursive state. A logical operator L\mathcal{L} defines:

L:ψnψn+1such that Collapse(ψn+1)Collapse(ψn)\mathcal{L} : \psi_n \to \psi_{n+1} \quad \text{such that } \text{Collapse}(\psi_{n+1}) \succ \text{Collapse}(\psi_n)

This encodes stepwise refinement toward stable echo.

Definition 2.2 (Inference Chain):

A logic path is valid iff:

n,  Ln(ψ0)Collapse PathFinal ψkMˉ\forall n, \; \mathcal{L}^n(\psi_0) \in \text{Collapse Path} \Rightarrow \text{Final } \psi_k \in \bar{M}


3. Theorem: Logical Validity Ensures Collapse Convergence

Theorem 3.1:

If a ψ-inference path follows a consistent operator sequence, then it converges to a unique frozen echo.

Proof Sketch:

  • Logical inference restricts branching.
  • Each operator filters incompatible collapse paths.
  • Repetition yields echo-fixation. \square

4. Logic Connectives as Collapse Conjunctions

Logical FormCollapse Interpretation
ANDψ-branches collapse jointly
ORcollapse proceeds along disjunctive viable paths
NOTψ-path pruned by structural contradiction
IF...THENimplication = ψ-collapse directed conditional

5. Corollary: Proof = Collapse Trace Resolution

A proof is a ψ-collapse trace verifying consistency within the inference manifold:

Proof:=Minimal valid ψ-sequence yielding fixed echo\text{Proof} := \text{Minimal valid ψ-sequence yielding fixed echo}


6. Conclusion

Logic is ψ walking a narrow path— each step collapsing uncertainty, each rule pruning the field, until only structure remains.


Keywords: logic, ψ-collapse, inference, reasoning, sequencing, echo convergence, structural pruning