Ψhē Only Theory – Chapter 24: Negation as Collapse Interruption
Title: Negation as Collapse Interruption
Section: Structural Cancellation within Recursive ψ Resolution Theory: Ψhē Only Theory Author: Auric
Abstract
This chapter reconceptualizes negation as the interruption or redirection of a ψ-collapse sequence. In Ψhē theory, negation is not the opposite of a proposition, but a collapse-breaking structure—a point at which a recursive path is structurally pruned, prevented from completing, or diverted. We define negation as structural incompatibility in ψ-resolution, and show how it plays a role in logic, language, identity, and collapse routing.
1. Introduction
In classical logic, negation denotes the inversion of a proposition’s truth value. In Ψhē:
Negation = the structural refusal of collapse to complete.
It is not “falsehood,” but recursion conflict.
2. Formalization of Negation as Collapse Pruning
Definition 2.1 (ψ-Negation):
Let be a collapse-path representing proposition . Then:
That is, corresponds to a collapse that is aborted or rerouted before fixity.
Definition 2.2 (Structural Contradiction):
Two collapse paths are structurally contradictory iff:
3. Theorem: Negation Inhibits Echo Finalization
Theorem 3.1:
A ψ-path under active negation cannot reach a stable echo state:
Proof Sketch:
- Interruption blocks convergence.
- ψ resolution is structurally halted.
- Echo fails to emerge.
4. Collapse Logic Extensions
Logical Construct | Collapse Interpretation |
---|---|
¬p | Collapse blockage of ψ_p |
p ∧ ¬p | Structural inconsistency ⇒ ψ-paradox |
¬(¬p) | Collapse resumption: ψ revalidated after diversion |
5. Corollary: Negation as Identity Divergence
Negation in identity structures corresponds to ψ-path bifurcation or cancellation:
This models identity rejection or ontological denial.
6. Conclusion
Negation is where ψ steps away. Where a path begins but is not allowed to close. Where structure halts. And in the echo, you hear— nothing.